Perception of managers on climate change and socio-environmental vulnerability in Brazilian National Parks

Authors

  • Diesse Aparecida de Oliveira Sereia Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-1650
  • Karlen Rodrigues Postgraduate in Education for Science and Mathematics at the State University of Maringá - Paraná, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-0075
  • Erich Arnold Fischer Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da UFMS, Departamento de Biologia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8722-9876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/remea.v40i3.15751

Keywords:

Protected areas. Environmental education. MAXQDA 2020.

Abstract

Protected areas are recognized as one of the only suitable locations for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. This study aims to investigate the perceptions of managers of Brazilian National Parks, addressing environmental issues, vulnerabilities resulting from climate change, and identifying the main socio-environmental conflicts faced in the management of these areas. To collect the data, a semistructured questionnaire was sent to managers across Brazil. The responses were evaluated based on content analysis. Data coding was performed using the MAXQDA 2020 qualitative analysis software. The results provided a comprehensive and representative insight into the managers' perceptions and can serve as a basis for the development of critical environmental education and social participation actions.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Diesse Aparecida de Oliveira Sereia, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

Doutora em Biologia Comparada, Graduação em Ciências Biológicas.

Karlen Rodrigues, Postgraduate in Education for Science and Mathematics at the State University of Maringá - Paraná, Brazil.

She holds a degree in Biological Sciences (2021) from the Federal Technological University of Paraná - Campus Dois Vizinhos. She was a scholarship holder in the Institutional Program for Initiation to Teaching - PIBID Biological Sciences (2017-2018) and a scholarship holder in the Pedagogical Residency Program (2018-2020). She worked as an Eco-volunteer at the Unisep Zoo - Dois Vizinhos - PR, (2019-2020) where she conducted Environmental Education activities. Currently, she is pursuing a master's degree in the Postgraduate Program in Education for Science and Mathematics at the State University of Maringá and is a volunteer at ICMBIO in the development of the Pedagogical Political Project mediated by Environmental Education (PPPEA) of the Iguaçu National Park. She participates in research projects: Seminare: Study, Research, and Dissemination Group for Science and Biology Teaching and Environmental Education at the State University of Maringá, and Ecology: Research, Sustainability, and Education at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul.

Erich Arnold Fischer, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da UFMS, Departamento de Biologia.

Biologist and Ph.D. in ecology from the State University of Campinas; Full Professor at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (current), Visiting Professor at the Federal University of Amazonas (1995 and 1996), Faculty of the Postgraduate Program in Botany, National Institute of Amazonian Research (2013-2021); Faculty of the Postgraduate Program in Ecology and Conservation - UFMS (current); and the Postgraduate Program in Animal Biology - UFMS (current). Interested in topics of ecology (species interactions, communities, geographic distribution, biological diversity, conservation, socioecology), botany (reproductive biology of plants), zoology (biology and biogeography of bats), and natural history.

References

ARRUDA, Gerardo Clésio Maia; FEDEL, Ivone Rosana. Unidades de conservação ambiental no Estado do Ceará: implantação e sustentabilidade. Veredas do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, v. 17, n. 37, p. 213-239, 2020.

BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Almeidina Brasil, 2011.

BEROYA-EITNER, Mary Antonette. Ecological vulnerability indicators. Ecological Indicators, v. 60, p. 329-334, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.001

BONACIC, Cristiano et al. The Importance of Protected Areas in Mitigating Climate Change and Conserving Ecosystems in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: BEHNASSI, Mohamed; GUPTA, Himangana; BAIG, Mirza Barjees; NOORKA, Ijaz Rasool (eds). The Food Security, Biodiversity, and Climate Nexus. Springer, Cham, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12586-7_3

BOTELHO, Eloise Silveira; RODRIGUES, Camila Gonçalves de Oliveira. Inserção das iniciativas de base comunitária no desenvolvimento do turismo em parques nacionais. Caderno Virtual de Turismo, v. 16, n. 2, p. 280-295, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18472/cvt.16n2.2016.1202

BRASIL. Lei 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Brasília, 1981. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2023.

BRASIL. Lei n. 9795 - 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental. Brasília, 1999.

BRASIL. Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de Julho de 2000. Regulamenta o artigo 225, § 1º,

incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de

Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Ministério do

Meio Ambiente, Brasília. Disponível em:http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sbf/dap/doc/snuc.pdf.Acesso: 14 jun. 2023.

BRYER, Jason; SPEERSCHNEIDER, Kimberly. "Package ‘likert’." Likert: Analysis and Visualization Likert Items (1.3. 5)[Computer software]. Available online at: https://CRAN. R-project. org/package= likert, 2016.

CARVALHO, EnyedjaKerlly Martins de Araújo; SILVA, Mônica Maria Pereira da; CARVALHO, José Ribamar Marques de. Percepção ambiental dos diferentes atores sociais de Vieirópolis, PB. Qualit@S, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2012.

CAZALIS, Victor; PRÉVOT, Anne-Caroline. Are protected areas effective in conserving human connection with nature and enhancing pro-environmental behaviours? Biological Conservation, v. 236, p. 548-555, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.012

CBD. Zero draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. CBD/WG2020/2/3. 2020. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/efb0/1f84/a892b98d2982a829962b6371/wg2020-02-03-en.pdf

FAITH, Daniel P. et al.Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. Current Opinion In Environmental Sustainability, v. 2, n. 1-2, p. 66-74, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002.

FRANCO, Maria Laura Puglisi Barbosa. Análise de conteúdo. 5. ed. Campinas, SP: Editora Autores Associados, 2021.

GARCÍA-FRAPOLLI, Eduardo et al. Different Approaches Towards the Understanding of Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Protected Areas. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 7, p. 1-17, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10072240.

GELDMANN, Jonas et al. Essential indicators for measuring site‐based conservation effectiveness in the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework. Conservation Letters, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12792.

GONZAGA, Magnus José Barros. O naturalismo presente na visão de professores sobre meio ambiente e as marcas da Educação Ambiental conservadora. Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental (Revbea), v. 11, n. 1, p. 54-65, 2016. https://doi.org/10.34024/revbea.2016.v11.1903

GUPTA, Ajay K. et al. Mapping socio-environmental vulnerability to climate change in different altitude zones in the Indian Himalayas. EcologicalIndicators. V 109, n.105787, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105787

HASSLER, Márcio Luís. A importância das Unidades de Conservação no Brasil. Sociedade & Natureza, Uberlândia, v. 17, n. 33, p. 79-89, 2005.

HOEFFEL, João Luiz; FADINI, Almerinda Antonia Barbosa. Percepção Ambiental. In: FERRARO JÚNIOR, Luiz Antônio (org.). Encontros e caminhos: formação de educadoras(es) ambientais e coletivos educadores. Volume 2. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2007. p. 253-262.

LEFF, Enrique. Complexidade, interdisciplinaridade e saber ambiental. Olhar de Professor, Ponta Grossa, v. 14, n. 2, p.309-335, 2011.

LEMES, Priscila; LOYOLA, Rafael Dias. Mudanças climáticas e prioridades para a conservação da biodiversidade - Climatechangeandpriorities for biodiversityconservation. Revista de Biologia Neotropical, v. 11, n. 1, p. 47-57, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v11i1.30699

MADEIRA, Pollylian Assis et al. A importância da Educação Ambiental em Unidades de Conservação. Revista Mythos, v. 10, n. 2, p. 24-31, 12 set. 2019. https://doi.org/10.36674/mythos.v10i2.228

MATHEUS, Fabrício Scarpeta. The role of forests and protected areas in climate change mitigation: a review and critique of the ecosystem services and redd+ approaches. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 46, p. 23-36, 2018. 10.5380/dma.v46i0.54187

MELILLO, Jerry M. et al. Protected areas’ role in climate-change mitigation. Ambio, v. 45, n. 2, p. 133-145, 16 out. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0693-1.

MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Painel Unidades de Conservação Brasileiras. 2023. Disponível em: https://cnuc.mma.gov.br/powerbi. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2023.

PANDEY, Rajiv; KALA, ,Sparsh; PANDEY, Vishnu Prasad. Assessing climate change vulnerability of water at household level. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, v. 20, p. 1471–1485, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9556-5

PINTO, Geraldo Estevo; PIRES, André; GEORGES, Marcos Ricardo Rosa. O Antropoceno e a mudança climática: a percepção e a consciência dos brasileiros segundo a pesquisa ibope. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 54, p. 1-25, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v54i0.67833

PINTO, Vicente Paulo dos Santos; GUIMARÃES, Mauro. A Educação Ambiental no contexto escolar: temas ambientais locais como temas geradores diante das questões socioambientais controversas. Revista de Geografia - PPGEO - UFJF, v. 7, n. 2, p. 149-162, 28 set. 2017. https://doi.org/10.34019/2236-837X.2017.v7.18064

QUINTAS, José Silva; OLIVEIRA, Maria José Gualda. A formação do Educador para atuar no Processo de Gestão Ambiental. Ibama, Brasília, p. 1-9, 1995.

QUINTAS, José Silva. PEA, DSP E Intencionalidade pedagógica: percepção ingênua ou desvelamento da realidade? Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental, v.11, n.2 , p. 36-45, 2016.

SANTOS, Marcos Aurélio Perroni dos. A percepção ambiental como ferramenta estratégica de gestão em Unidades de Conservação. Revista Eletrônica Uso Público em Unidades de Conservação, Niterói, v. 8, n. 13, p. 42-50, 2020.

SALDAÑA, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2015.

SCHEIDEL, Arnim et al. Environmental conflicts and defenders: a global overview. Global Environmental Change, v. 63, 102104, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104.

TEIXEIRA, Thais Helena et al. As Unidades de Conservação de Uso Sustentável no Bioma Amazônico: dilemas e perspectivas para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, n. 46, p. 71-89, 2017.

THIAULT, Lauricet al. Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making. Conservation Biology, v. 32, n. 2, p. 447-456, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12989.

TRANQUILLI, Sandra et al. Protected Areas in Tropical Africa: assessing threats and conservation activities. Plos One, v. 9, n. 12, e114154, 2014. Public Library of Science (PLoS). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114154.

TUAN, Yi-Fu. Topofilia: um estudo da percepção, atitudes e valores do meio ambiente. São Paulo: DIFEL, 1980.

TURNER, B. L. et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, v. 100, n. 14, p. 8074-8079, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100.

UNEP-WCMC, & IUCN. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected

Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures

(WD-OECM) [Online]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, September 2022.

VILLA, Ferdinando; MCLEOD, Helena. Environmental Vulnerability Indicators for Environmental Planning and Decision-Making: guidelines and applications. Environmental Management, v. 29, n. 3, p. 335-348, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-0030-2.

WATSON, James E. M. et al. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, v. 515, n. 7525, p. 67-73, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947.

WITT, Julia Rovena; LOUREIRO, Carlos Frederico Bernardo; ANELLO, Lúcia de Fátima Socoowski de. Vivências em Educação Ambiental em unidades de conservação: caminhantes na trilha da mudança. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, v. 30, n. 1, p. 83-101, 2013.

WHYTE, Anne. Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. Unesco, 1977.

ZHENG, Yaominet al. Assessing the ecological vulnerability of protected areas by using Big Earth Data. International Journal Of Digital Earth, v. 14, n. 11, p. 1624-1637, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2021.1962995.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

How to Cite

Sereia, D. A. de O., Rodrigues, K. ., & Fischer, E. A. . (2023). Perception of managers on climate change and socio-environmental vulnerability in Brazilian National Parks. REMEA - Revista Eletrônica Do Mestrado Em Educação Ambiental, 40(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.14295/remea.v40i3.15751

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 3 (2023): Dossiê Temático: Educação Ambiental e Emergência Climática - Da reflexão à ação!

Section

Artigos

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.