Novel Approaches on Reactor Core Design Optimization Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/vetor.v31i1.13498Keywords:
Nuclear reactor core design, Optimization, Differential Evolution, Invasive Weed Optimization, Many-Objective Evolutionary AlgorithmAbstract
Nuclear reactor core design is an optimization problem concerning the pertinent choice of a series of parameters that must obey some technical and physical constraints. Several methods have been applied in literature in order to obtain the optimal solution for this problem. The present work aims to provide a comparative analysis of two optimization methodologies in the reactor core design, as follows: Invasive Weed Optimization and Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm.
Downloads
References
T. O. M. Muniz and F. B. S. Oliveira, “Modelagem computacional de uma blindagem de nêutrons utilizando métodos determinísticos,” VETOR - Revista de Ciências Exatas e Engenharias, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 15–27, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14295/vetor.v30i1.12877
D. Rozon and M. Beauet, “Canada deuterium uranium reactor design optimization using three-dimensional generalized perturbation theory,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 111, pp. 1–12, 1992. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23919
D. J. Kropackzek and P. J. Turinsky, “In-core nuclear fuel management optimization for pressurized water reactors utilizing simulated annealing,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 95, p. 9, 1991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13182/NT95-1-9
J. Chapot, F. C. Silva, and R. Schirru, “A new approach to the use of genetic algorithms to solve the pressurized water reactor’s fuel management optimization problem,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 26, no. 7, p. 641, 1999. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(98)00078-4
W. Sacco, N. Henderson, A. Rios-Coelho, M. Ali, and C. Pereira, “Differential evolution algorithms applied to nuclear reactor core design,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1093–1099, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.05.007
J. Suich and H. Honec, “The hammer system heterogeneous analysis by multigroup methods of exponentials and reactors,” Savannah River Laboratory, 1967. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2172/4440604
R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution – a simple and e cient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, 1997. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
A. R. Mehrabian and C. Lucas, “A novel numerical optimization algorithm inspired from weed colonization,” Ecological informatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2006. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2006.07.003
Z. He and G. Yen, “Many-objective evolutionary algorithm: Objective space reduction + diversity improvement,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 145-160, 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2015.2433266
K. Deb and R. B. Agrawal, “Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space,” Complex Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 115–148, 1995. Available at: https://www.complex-systems.com/abstracts/v09_i02_a02/
M. M. Raghuwanshi and O. Kakde, “Survey on multiobjective evolutionary and real coded genetic algorithms,” Proceedings of the 8th Asia Paci c symposium on intelligent and evolutionary systems, pp. 150–161, 2004. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.2396&rep=rep1&type=pdf
E. Beale, “Confidence-regions in non-linear estimation,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B-Statistical Methodology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–88, 1960. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983877
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-11-23 (2)
- 2021-11-18 (1)